Speed vs Quality: Why Faster Isn't Always Better

Let’s get this out of the way: the debate over speed vs quality in creative work isn’t a new thing. It’s old. Ancient, maybe. Cavemen probably stewed on it when deciding how long to spend chiseling a spear. But in the world of social media marketing, where trends last about as long as a sneeze, some say the balance has shifted irreversibly.

So what do you do? Should you post quickly and ride the wave of what's trending? Or ask for more time to craft something that looks like it’s heading for Cannes? You probably already know the exasperating answer: it depends. And yes, that’s a cop-out. But it’s also the truth.

‍

Speed vs Quality in the Digital Age

Speed isn't just about how fast you can click "publish," and quality isn’t simply how slick your graphics are. The impact that the work has is connected to the nature of the work process.

Speed means getting content out fast enough to still matter. That’s harder than ever. It demands creative that is reactive, jumping on the news cycle before it’s replaced. 

Quality is about craft, depth, consistency, and often, brand security. Some companies need to be seen to be investing in high production value. One prioritizes timeliness. The other, timelessness.

Fundamentally, everyone wants both. And often, they want it yesterday.

‍

What Does "Quality" Actually Mean?

Here’s the thing: quality isn’t the same for everyone. In this industry, it changes depending on who you ask.

To a brand manager, quality might mean beautifully shot video with pixel-perfect edits.

To a performance marketer, quality is the creative that maxes clicks and conversions.

To an audience, quality might just mean something that made them laugh or shared relevant information about a product or service.

There’s another counterintuitive truth that needs to be faced here. High quality doesn’t always equal high performance. Some of the best-performing social ads look like they were filmed on a cracked iPhone in someone’s bedroom.

And that’s because, frequently, they were.

So when someone says, "We need to focus on quality," the real question is: whose version of quality are we aiming for?

‍

Speed vs Quality: Stakeholder Priorities Matter

Let’s say you're working with a fast-moving startup. They’ll likely prioritize speed. Volume, testing, iteration. That means taking risks, assessing, tweaking and repeating.

Now swap that for a global brand with a legal department and six layers of approvals. Suddenly, speed is the enemy. Quality (their definition of quality) is king.

Understanding the client's priorities is essential. Some clients will choose Oscar-winners over performers. Others will happily trade polish for clicks.

‍

The Cost-Speed-Quality Triangle: Pick Two

The holy trinity of project management:

Fast.
Good.
Cheap.

You can pick two, and sacrifice the third.

That’s the commonly held belief. Want it good and fast? It won’t be cheap. Want it cheap and fast? Don’t expect great quality. Want it good and cheap? It’ll be a while.

But if you get practical, and ask the right questions, you can find a balance that works for any specific client and any specific goal. That’s why one of the first questions we ask a client is: What matters more on this project? 

It sets the tone. It avoids frustration. It keeps everyone honest.

‍

How We Maintain Quality on Tight Deadlines

Let’s not talk vaguely about "efficiency" and move on. Let’s get specific. Here’s how Flixr actually balances speed and quality:

• Faith in iteration: All creative work can serve as a template for the next creative work. When all ineffective low-quality work is discarded, what’s left will naturally be a useful framework to speed up production without killing creativity.
• Collaborative workflows: While copy is being written, editors are in touch to be able to source the best visuals, quickly. No waiting around.
• Pre-built assets: We keep an up-to-date and ready-to-go library of trends, transitions and motion graphics to delve into as required.
• Creative sprints: When timelines are tight, we treat projects like hackathons. Everyone in, fast turnaround, high intensity.
• Clear briefs: Clear briefs = fewer revisions = faster, better work.

Speed and quality don’t have to be enemies. But they do need a system to work together.

‍

When to Prioritize Speed vs Quality

Here’s a handy way to think about it:

Go for speed when

• You’re reacting to a trending moment
• You're running A/B tests or experiments
• Volume and frequency matter more than polish
• You have limited budget or time

Go for quality when

• You’re producing hero content or brand films
• You want to build long-term brand equity
• You’re targeting high-stakes audiences (investors, press, B2B decision-makers)
• You need emotional impact or storytelling depth

And sometimes, the answer is both. You just need to know where to push and where to pull back. 

‍

Conclusion

That’s the whole point. Speed vs quality isn’t a fight. It’s a negotiation. A balancing act.

If you lean too far into speed, your work risks feeling rushed and disposable. If you chase perfection, you might miss the moment entirely. The sweet spot? Delivering quality that’s good enough fast, with the occasional showstopper that takes longer.

This only starts with asking better questions. Who’s this for? What does success look like? What do we sacrifice?

Speed vs quality isn’t a zero-sum game. It’s an ongoing conversation. And we’re here for it.

‍